From owner-cvs-all Mon Apr 23 13:24:53 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE4B37B42C; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:24:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3NKOh875408; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:24:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200104232024.f3NKOh875408@harmony.village.org> To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include stdio.h src/sys/sys vnode.h Cc: "David E. O'Brien" , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2001 08:41:04 PDT." References: Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:24:43 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message John Baldwin writes: : From style(9): : : static char *function(int _arg, const char *_arg2, struct foo *_arg3, : struct bar *_arg4); : static void usage(void); : : Thus it seems that the continuation line for prototypes is to line up the : second line with the arguments. Perhaps style(9) should be changed, but 4 : space indents for prototype continuation lines isn't style(9) as it is : currently defined. That's not my understanding of style(9) or existing practice in conformant modules. Of course, I see a lot of different continuation styles in stdio.h: static char *function(int _arg, const char *_arg2, struct foo *_arg3, struct bar *_arg4); static char *function(int _arg, const char *_arg2, struct foo *_arg3, struct bar *_arg4); but I am pretty sure that the ( alignment is wrong or accidental. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message