Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 07:00:31 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r373636 - in head: . Mk/Uses archivers/gtar audio/clementine-player audio/gbemol audio/gkrellmms2 audio/gkrellmss2 audio/gkrellmvolume2 audio/kstreamripper audio/pavucontrol audio/pms a... Message-ID: <20141201070030.GA71576@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20141130180048.35a04df5@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <201411291822.sATIMXqv034069@svn.freebsd.org> <20141130154810.GA44358@FreeBSD.org> <20141130180048.35a04df5@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 06:00:48PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:48:10 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better if instead of two new Uses/gettext-* files, existing > > Uses/gettext.mk accepted arguments (like, USES=gettext:build and :run)? > > > > Similar to what other Uses/* files are already doing. > > USES=gettext-runtime has three arguments (lib, build and run) and > USES=gettext-tools has two (build and run). Combining these in one > USES=gettext means you need five arguments: runtime-lib, runtime-build, > runtime-run, tools-build and tools-run. The default would be > "runtime-lib,tools-build". The two separate USES are easier to implement > and easier to understand in my opinion. OK, I see your point. Fair enough, thanks for explaining. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141201070030.GA71576>