Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:37:27 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld times have grown over the last 2-4 years Message-ID: <20130620103727.GA86397@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <201306200755.r5K7tEbk088581@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201306200755.r5K7tEbk088581@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:55:14AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Here are the buildworld times I recorded few years ago, > perhaps 2-4 years ago: > > CPU nCPUs freq RAM options machine time walltime details > US-IIIi 1 1.5GHz 2GB -j4 world 11002.412u 1884.324s 3:37:06.62 98.9% 41213+7043k 20109+243707io 11158pf+0w > US-IIIi 1 1.5GHz 2GB -j3 world 12912.094u 2300.253s 4:18:20.86 98.1% 41265+6978k 14935+284277io 11922pf+0w > US-IIIi 1 1.5GHz 5GB -j4 world 13261.202u 2353.236s 4:25:47.90 97.9% 41275+6963k 22471+284966io 12870pf+0w > US-IIIi 1 1.5GHz 5GB -j5 world 13273.154u 2339.206s 4:34:01.17 94.9% 41334+6971k 25581+284635io 12941pf+0w > > This week on the same single processor box > with 2GB RAM with -j4 it took 5h55m. > > All times are for full buildworld, i.e. > no src.conf at all. > > Has the src tree grown that much? > Yes, there's constant growth; atf, clang (at least tblgen is always built, even if clang is not usable on a particular architecture), compiler-rt (in addition to still building some bits of libgcc, as it's not a full replacement of the latter, yet), libyaml, svn (plus dependencies like apr, serf, sqlite3), just to name some stuff that has been added in the last 3 years. Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130620103727.GA86397>