Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 15:32:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243960] [NEW PORT] sysutils/helm2 reintroduce helm version 2 port Message-ID: <bug-243960-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243960 Bug ID: 243960 Summary: [NEW PORT] sysutils/helm2 reintroduce helm version 2 port Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: philipp@copythat.de Created attachment 211449 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D211449&action= =3Dedit readds helm2 To ease the transition from helm 2 to helm 3 I'd like to propose introducing helm 2 as a "helm2" port. I've also updated helm 2 to the the latest patch release of helm 2. I'm not sure if there are special criteria to introduce such transition or legacy ports. If this is a completely outlandish idea, have mercy, I may ha= ve learned a bit or two about the technical aspects of ports but policy wise I= 'm quite unsure. Should DEPRECATED be set for this port? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243960-7788>