From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 21 18:51:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA49106566B for ; Sat, 21 May 2011 18:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 65-241-43-5.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85D314F814; Sat, 21 May 2011 18:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DD809C2.8080704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 11:51:46 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110429 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Bowman References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridging + VLANS X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 18:51:51 -0000 On 05/21/2011 01:58, Matthew Bowman wrote: > I have an uplink to my ISP on a 2 IP /30 network (1.1.1.0/30 in the diagram) No help for your actual problem, sorry. I just wanted to point out that 1/8 has been assigned by IANA to APNIC, so it should not be used as a substitute for RFC 1918 space. I'm assuming that you're just using it as a placeholder for the real assignment, however I would argue that even that is a bad idea since at minimum it's a bad example that others may draw poor conclusions from. Yours in pedantry, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/