From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 19 15:52:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF75716A4DD; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084A543D5A; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:52:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [87.240.16.199] (helo=[192.168.0.4]) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1GET7F-0006YA-Qb; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:52:06 +0400 Message-ID: <44E7337A.1000900@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:51:22 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gábor Kövesdán References: <44E38E2F.4000005@FreeBSD.org> <44E391AD.3010402@FreeBSD.org> <44E39535.10701@FreeBSD.org> <20060816234236.3428ab08@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <20060817094501.GA98961@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060817084317.55ae1c08@demarc.ca.sophos.com> <20060817163848.GA27460@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060817134546.0c05e607@demarc.ca.sophos.com> <20060817222937.GA38985@xor.obsecurity.org> <44E6F4FB.3070907@FreeBSD.org> <20060819132055.GA5314@xor.obsecurity.org> <44E71150.9080906@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <44E71150.9080906@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Brian Somers , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: nullfs performance (Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.emacs.mk bsd.gnome.mk bsd.mail.mk bsd.openssl.mk bsd.port.mk bsd.port.subdir.mk bsd.python.mk bsd.ruby.mk bsd.scons.mk ports/Tools/scripts security-check.awk ports/databases/p5-DBD-Oracle Makefile ports/databases/p5-sqlrelay ...) X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:52:14 -0000 Gábor Kövesdán wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Presumably it is not enabled in your kernel and you do not have the >> module available either (it is present on a default installation >> though). I use nullfs on amd64 every day so I know it works fine. >> >> Kris >> > Ah, you're right, I found it in NOTES, but I don't see why this feature > is not in the GENERIC kernel. This is a production system where I don't > have modules, that's why I had the error, but imho it should be added to > GENERIC as well. > It's a little strange argument. I have modules on all my production systems. And use nullfs only on few of them. What's wrong with modules? Well, I don't use GENERIC kernel really. -- Dixi. Sem.