From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 12 11:46:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53176A63; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cochard@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x232.google.com (mail-vb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0552C192; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id w15so2029775vbb.23 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:46:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=7qqFYig4fG+534iSTqfHsqpwHtt/C2WBrZ0i8B6voVY=; b=RSd+JY26JgA6t/0yDZ7AGG9o679pZlfgCk0fPIb9VAV4BG8/+p6cC4z8QM6x0eUdwM 2Z6/4THn1PONmr2OfaCF62N62WexwBBUP8tjVTe1K/A6PKt+nZj8198xN11iDviqUO8E HXejX4XD/dvwCfVVqw7oqFN6i46Wc2UBskX8ujX6FXdfYd4FAVcChrAaGAG7LZALSHaf gLjXulZSIw3DqXNkHh3Eo/gyEjWri0qNRkVe8ASAES8JWfPQTRvQtqiVEYdfLc/scefM Ug/TzaX6d8eh93gvzKtwXSY4gSJrGGORCrdOLd7Tc2e9M877kykFEahPjv1foF1XQZSr oqkg== X-Received: by 10.220.65.1 with SMTP id g1mr8133093vci.63.1365767172520; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:46:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cochard@gmail.com Received: by 10.59.9.103 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:45:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201304111942.r3BJg1Eh085644@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201304111942.r3BJg1Eh085644@freefall.freebsd.org> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:45:51 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -NzL_XzPelH0F1UM8f7WRJsRchI Message-ID: Subject: Re: kern/165903: mbuf leak To: Gleb Smirnoff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , eugene@zhegan.in X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:46:13 -0000 Hi, PR closed too soon ? All of our firewalls just migrated to 9.0 firewall (carp + pfsync) hit memory leak problem. Here is some output: Mem: 17M Active, 15M Inact, 1709M Wired, 1392K Cache, 143M Buf, 229M Free => 1709M Wired just for a firewall ? On other machine: # netstat -m 2188812/1278/2190090 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 6132/1762/7894/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 6132/1036 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/54/54/12800 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/6400 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/3200 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 559467K/4059K/563526K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0/0/0 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 calls to protocol drain routines Regards, Olivier