From owner-cvs-ports Sat Nov 15 04:02:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA24488 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 04:02:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-ports) Received: from bubble.didi.com (sjx-ca124-30.ix.netcom.com [207.223.162.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA23568; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 03:58:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.didi.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA02971; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 03:57:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 03:57:59 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711151157.DAA02971@bubble.didi.com> To: ache@nagual.pp.ru CC: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= on Sat, 15 Nov 1997 14:52:20 +0300 (MSK)) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/netscape4 Makefile ports/www/netscape4/files md5 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * I mean different situation: you make package on one machine and then * install it on several other machines on local net. Yeah, but that's a very special case. Besides, how hard would it be to just use the port instead? Let's not be a pedant. I've seen too much of these talk lately in the ports area. If you are going to give me such a hard time every time netscape upgrades the port, I'll split the port up so we won't step on each other's toes. Satoshi