From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 5 21:44:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3731065670; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE878FC1D; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:44:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (really [76.182.207.163]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090705184951352.JPXA24657@cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:49:51 +0000 Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:49:49 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu , Sahil Tandon Message-ID: <4ED7FF030DD8AEF9F1B2A039@Macintosh-2.local> In-Reply-To: <20090705111532.61c2dd65@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <23B9298D1A02526B4646B131@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <91D041090FA2939A0942293F@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <4C41B4EAEF8C942A8D085916@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <994EF1F5-0A23-4A4F-B853-48AED6A5529F@tandon.net> <20090705111532.61c2dd65@it.buh.tecnik93.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Alex Goncharov Subject: Re: can you PLEASE _read_ the QAT mails? (was: Re: Question about a failure report) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:44:36 -0000 --On July 5, 2009 11:15:32 AM +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Paul, I'm not picking on you, it's just that it's the 4th mail I get in > the last days showing the same thing. > Sigh, at lest this one was a question, not trying to convince me QATty > setup is wrong because we don't support non-default configs. > > For short, your port's configure script fails to search for mysql > headers in the right place; QATty has LOCALBASE and PREFIX set > to /usr/PPP. If you can't sorted out in a few days drop me an email and > I'll take a look. No offense taken. The thing that confused me is that I always build my ports in /tmp/portname when testing, but barnyard still managed to find mysql headers when building. So I didn't understand why it was failing in QAT. I followed all the links in the email and read the materials, but I still didn't understand why the build failed in QAT. I didn't want to make a change to the port unless the problem really was with the port. That's why I asked the question. Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ****************************************** WARNING: Check the headers before replying