From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 15 21:59:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0205716A41A for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10EC13C474; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <46EC55B8.2090107@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:59:20 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: josh.carroll@gmail.com References: <26ddd1750709141351i3646e9bdg8d8b7e93461167f9@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750709151014x2112b022r9bcb999fbf1e7e49@mail.gmail.com> <46EC270A.3020100@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0709151421h7bfdeb6fo7dc671820294e9c7@mail.gmail.com> <46EC4F59.7070104@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0709151435p72cd328by63895421f3a63ea4@mail.gmail.com> <46EC50DA.6000104@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0709151446x4c54a520u2d5cd543ba1541e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8cb6106e0709151446x4c54a520u2d5cd543ba1541e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Maxim Khitrov , Aryeh Friedman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a new workstation - dual or quad-core CPU for FreeBSD 7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:59:21 -0000 Josh Carroll wrote: >> That's good to know. You should be using libthr for threaded >> performance though :) That benchmark is probably almost all userland >> though, so performance may not suffer much from libpthread. > > Oh I wasn't sure if libthr was the preferred thread library for 6.2 > also (I'd heard that was the case for -CURRENT). > > I should look into whether ffmpeg can be built with libthr instead and > compare performance. Somewhat off topic, so I'll leave it at that, but > thanks again for the great info. I'm really looking forward to > 7.0-RELEASE, obviously :) Yeah, it is preferred on 6.x too (libkse has truly atrocious performance). It's trivial to change it over, just add an entry to /etc/libmap.conf: libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 Kris