From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 11:34:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAA116A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:34:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from sv02.webonaut.com (kirk.webonaut.com [212.41.243.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79F543D2B for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:34:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from klammer@webonaut.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sv02.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E057642D; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:34:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from sv02.webonaut.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sv02.webonaut.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92723-02; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:34:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from webonaut.com (sisko.webonaut.com [212.41.243.28]) by sv02.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1287642C; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:34:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3FD77547.8020709@webonaut.com> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:34:31 +0100 From: Franz Klammer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Marcus Clarke References: <20031210074908.GA96681@wolverine.home.net> <1071064474.19033.6.camel@wolverine.home.net> <1071079364.769.13.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <1071079364.769.13.camel@gyros> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at webonaut.com cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: Nautilus 2.5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:34:31 -0000 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 08:54, Khairil Yusof wrote: > > >>On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 03:17 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> >> >> >>>Yeah, I get that too.. Tomorrow, I am planning to clear all of stuff like >>>~/.gnome2, ~/.gconf and etc to see if this issue is still there. >>> >>> >>First thing I tried :) >> >>Didn't change anything. I couldn't find a bug report in bugzilla, >>wondering if this is a FreeBSD issue. I'm submitting one anyways. Bugs >>in 2.5 seem minor. >> >>Posting this from Evo 1.5 now. Unlike Gnome 2.5.. it really feels like a >>development release. >> >> > >I would advise anyone that's submitting a bug in either GNOME 2.5 or Evo >1.5 to make sure all their libraries are in sync first. That is, make >sure each binary only links against one version of a given library. > > i'm doing nothing else as be sure that the libraries are in sync since i've installed gnome 2.5 - they bring out updates in minutes ;-) (the last libbonobo*-update completely shoots my gnome-installation.) currently i'm thinking about an automated script that does the job in the background. but that's not so easy: a portupgrade -rf updates every package in +REQUIRED_BY even it's not necessary - is there an easy way to figure out the _exact_ names of the ports they _really_ using the given port? i know that this could be dangerous - but i think not so dangerous as the last bonobo-update ;-) franz. >Also try to include as much console/error output as possible (if it's >relevant). Sometimes, you may have to start bonobo-activation-server, >for example, by hand to get all the necessary output. And, of course, >be sure to build all components with "-O -g -pipe" and STRIP= to ensure >we get good stack traces. Also, anytime you can provide a patch, please >do so (even if it's a simple header file include patch). The more >patches we can feed back to GNOME, the more seriously they will take >us. Thanks. > >Joe > > > -- webonaut.com :: web technology klammer@webonaut.com :: http://webonaut.com/ fon +43-664-3434708 -- MIG_media intelligence group > agentur für werbung & neue medien A-5020 Salzburg > Linzergasse 21 Fon +43-662-453091-0 > Fax -99 office@mig.co.at > http://www.mig.co.at --