Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:09:37 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de> Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Back to the Future - 64-bit time_t on sparc64 Message-ID: <p06020460bc5d5cf8f281@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <p0602045fbc5d5375b7d9@[128.113.24.47]> References: <40306CE7.6080104@mindspring.com> <20040216193108.GE12181@seekingfire.com> <p0602041ebc56dd660908@[128.113.24.47]> <20040217040616.GL12181@seekingfire.com> <20040219143838.GL68388@seekingfire.com> <p0602044bbc5ac1a48967@[128.113.24.47]> <20040219204008.GB3545@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <p0602044cbc5ad23c6d38@[128.113.24.47]> <20040219205750.GC3545@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <p06020453bc5b2ce4acc3@[128.113.24.47]> <20040220035635.GA69900@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <p0602045abc5c248db8bd@[128.113.24.47]> <20040221140438.M87450@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <p0602045fbc5d5375b7d9@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 1:59 PM -0500 2/21/04, Garance A Drosihn wrote: >Also keep in mind that whatever we do for 5.x-current, we will >also have users who are sticking on 5.2.1-security until 5.2- >release comes out. It would be nice if they also had a way to >make a smooth transition, without the risk of shooting their >foot off... No matter how many times I re-read my messages, there is often some mistake that I don't see until after I post it... Of course I meant: "are sticking with 5.2.1-security until *5.3* is released." -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06020460bc5d5cf8f281>