From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri May 24 17:50:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA23849
          for bugs-outgoing; Fri, 24 May 1996 17:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA23826;
          Fri, 24 May 1996 17:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 24 May 1996 17:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199605250050.RAA23826@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: James Raynard <james@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: bin/1229: redundant redeclaration of `lseek'
Reply-To: James Raynard <james@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR bin/1229; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: James Raynard <james@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
To: bde@zeta.org.au
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/1229: redundant redeclaration of `lseek'
Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 01:17:34 GMT

 > >sys/types.h has a prototype for lseek(). So does unistd.h, which 
 > >#include's sys/types.h
 > 
 > It really shouldn't be declared in <sys/types.h> if _POSIX_SOURCE
 > is defined.
 > 
 > I want the kludge of declaring lseek() in <sys/types.h> extended:
 
 Thanks, I see the point of it now. Do I get the impression, reading
 between the lines, that you would like to have a different compiler
 available? 8-)
 
 BTW, I don't know if you remember the discussion on -hackers a couple
 of weeks ago about system() and popen(), but I now have about 1000
 lines of diffs to libc. They've been running on my system for a few
 days without any obvious problems, although that probably doesn't
 prove much. (I've had quite a few other problems, but they've been
 going on since the VM check-in).
 
 Is there anywhere I should send them to?
 
 -- 
 James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland
 jraynard@dial.pipex.com
 james@jraynard.demon.co.uk