Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:25:27 +0200 From: "Julian Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org> To: chinsan <chinsan.tw@gmail.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pax in /rescue Message-ID: <200809080925.m889PRLA083055@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:22:44 %2B0800." <1f27304c0809062222m724603dat2fb1af63dba5faa6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Reference: > From: chinsan <chinsan.tw@gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:22:44 +0800 > Message-id: <1f27304c0809062222m724603dat2fb1af63dba5faa6@mail.gmail.com> chinsan wrote: > On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:40 PM, M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > Is there any reason to continue to include both tar and pax in > > /rescue? > > > Maybe for rescue some important file? > BTW, could editors/e3 be include into /rescue? > I think it's ineed to have a text editor to edit some file for rescue. > Because vi(1) lives in /usr/bin. No, use ed, ed has been in Unix 30+ years. /bin/ed > ps. e3 is a full featured text editor written in NASM assembler. It is highly > optimized for size. No, FreeBSD is not just i386. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey: BSDUnixLinux C Prog Admin SysEng Consult Munich www.berklix.com Mail plain ASCII text. HTML & Base64 text are spam. www.asciiribbon.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809080925.m889PRLA083055>