From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Aug 27 05:47:45 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D46CB19A for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 05:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from muon.bsdio.com (muon.bluestop.org [65.103.231.193]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46HdFD1NdFz4QsP for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 05:47:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from muon.bsdio.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.bsdio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EB7F75A0; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:47:46 -0600 (MDT) Received: from muon.bsdio.com ([127.0.0.1]) by muon.bsdio.com (muon.bsdio.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2drlQXSnRJcR; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:47:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.197] (unknown [10.0.10.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.bsdio.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:47:45 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found From: Rebecca Cran X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G77) In-Reply-To: <2F3BAE06-4A3F-4FD2-94ED-886FEDA2ED93@me.com> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:47:40 -0600 Cc: Warner Losh , "O. Hartmann" , greg@unrelenting.technology, Karl Denninger , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20190821232334.433d285c@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <20190821195847.577a165b@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <48D9A1D1-5A54-4FED-8DC8-40C9A5C9BE3A@me.com> <20190821213052.25d61cb4@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <480F8DE0-A38F-4BCA-9F36-0D812CDB7DD8@me.com> <20190821223140.643f6c63@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <483d59b24a636d0214555610350b8d73@unrelenting.technology> <20190822050509.64c88a51@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <12E83654-1104-408E-9A1E-BE79308B9A92@me.com> <20190826132150.6f748419@freyja> <2F3BAE06-4A3F-4FD2-94ED-886FEDA2ED93@me.com> To: Toomas Soome X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46HdFD1NdFz4QsP X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com has no SPF policy when checking 65.103.231.193) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.46 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.977,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[me.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.103.224.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.89)[ip: (-9.34), asn: 209(-0.04), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 05:47:45 -0000 > On Aug 26, 2019, at 11:43 PM, Toomas Soome wrote: >=20 > For me it is still confusing if this is path versus upper-lower capital ch= ars.=20 >=20 > If that vendor is using suggestion from UEFI Spec 2.7A section 3.5.1.1 (pa= ge 91), then the file name should also end with .EFI. (and yes, I know, that= section is talking about removable media). >=20 > Therefore the question is, does lenovo accept name like EFI/FREEBSD/LOADER= .EFI? Or what form is used there for windows paths? >=20 > If we should or should not use EFI/BOOT path - perhaps the installer shoul= d prefer vendor path by default. But till there is confusion, there should b= e some notes in some documentation... Being a FAT filesystem I don=E2=80=99t think upper/lower case matters. Personally I think we should always install to the vendor path, and also ins= tall to EFI/BOOT if somebody else hasn=E2=80=99t already got files there. =E2=80=94=20 Rebecca=20=