From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 06:49:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104F41065677 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outY.internet-mail-service.net (outy.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF8F8FC1D for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:49:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DB823FB; Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22A12D609D; Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48B255F7.70500@elischer.org> Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:49:27 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Leffler References: <200808250520.m7P5KeZN042431@repoman.freebsd.org> <48B241F8.7010907@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <48B241F8.7010907@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer , cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net80211 ieee80211_ddb.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:49:29 -0000 Sam Leffler wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: >> julian 2008-08-25 05:20:29 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> sys/net80211 ieee80211_ddb.c Log: >> SVN rev 182144 on 2008-08-25 05:20:29Z by julian >> This instance of ifnet got forgotten. >> > Does this mean that ddb operation will be constrained by whatever the > last vimage instance was? I'm not fully following all the vimage > changes but I suspect ddb-related stuff should not change. > > Sam actually what will happen with the final code is that you will get iterated through the virtual machines. but this commit is not doing that yet.. it is still 2 commits in the future. this however marks the spot for further work. If you would like a particular behaviour other than mentioned above, let me know and I'll gladly do it.