From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jun 26 23:36:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FE437BE3D for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:36:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA72529; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:36:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id AAA32148; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:34:53 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200006270634.AAA32148@harmony.village.org> To: Sergei Vyshenski Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5 now available for x86 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Jun 2000 02:34:04 +0400." <4.3.2.7.0.20000627022543.00ab0cc0@vivaldi> References: <4.3.2.7.0.20000627022543.00ab0cc0@vivaldi> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:34:53 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <4.3.2.7.0.20000627022543.00ab0cc0@vivaldi> Sergei Vyshenski writes: : So FreeBSD has two stable branches? : Which one is more stable among stable for i386? : Say for use at a site that need reliable round-the-clock : gatewaing, named and mail operation? I'd use 4.0-stable. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message