From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  9 21:12:11 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B09316A41C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 21:12:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from vladgalu@gmail.com)
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593B343D1F
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 21:12:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from vladgalu@gmail.com)
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so364618nzo
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
	b=VHtMo43vBv1nj3+g8m0LWox1A7DlsKJ4vAMBffmc11TrA/xT1LN96GL/2xoMYxBrWBrJggmR8mZR+3hYrms40Lykd1kwp97PzvYrrNA9FWBW98xgAaoLLzbSbP/QTLNhfjO6Fb3yfp4GqsJ7VwIglBWlDeGx5TU0qmS5e3PDfSg=
Received: by 10.36.46.20 with SMTP id t20mr662385nzt;
	Thu, 09 Jun 2005 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.86.4 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <79722fad05060914123edd1004@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:12:07 +0300
From: Vlad GALU <vladgalu@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: 
Subject: Please review & test this
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Vlad GALU <vladgalu@gmail.com>
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:12:11 -0000

        As you may all know, the packet classifier in ALTQ is very
slow on large numbers of classes, because it stores them linearly, in
an array. I rewrote the way classes are stored, replacing the array
with a hash table. I tested [1] on a system with about 8000 classes
and noticed a remarkable performance difference (the system went from
almost unusable to nice & smooth). It breaks the ABI by adding an
extra TAILQ_ENTRY  member to the HFSC class structure, though. If
anyone reviews and tests it, I would be grateful.

[1] http://night.rdslink.ro/dudu/altq/altq_hfschash.diff

P.S. please keep in mind that I'm not exactly a black belt in kernel
programming, so glitches might exist. I would be most happy to hear
some suggestions.

--=20
If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual.
If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent.
If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.