Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 09:03:38 -0600 From: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> To: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: ACLs on fusefs Message-ID: <CAOtMX2gHnNna_o6ig23PEPabWnQzPvQe-N8N%2BV8CAdsY-AzCBQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <202408030413.4734D5gd042998@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> References: <CAOtMX2jska_8yG0tf31nEFDQCkQODim8yLBt2qRQ4LbBVc8ZAQ@mail.gmail.com> <202408030413.4734D5gd042998@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 10:13=E2=80=AFPM Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.o= rg> wrote: > > Alan Somers <asomers@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > TLDR; > > how useful would it be if fusefs(4) could support ACLs? > > I, personally, don't use ACLs generally, so have not missed them on > fusefs. > > However, I do make extensive use of XATTRs, so those are what I've > really missed. > > I didn't know xatrs were now supported - is that a new thing, or maybe > the client I use (borgs sshfs implementation) needs to be updated? > > Cheers, Jamie Our fusefs has supported xattrs for a long time. But the specific fuse file system needs support too. Looking right now, I don't see any support in sysutils/fusefs-sshfs .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOtMX2gHnNna_o6ig23PEPabWnQzPvQe-N8N%2BV8CAdsY-AzCBQ>