From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 03:10:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7124A16A4CE; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 03:10:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D5E43D41; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 03:10:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i7C39DTH027911; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:09:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i7C39D1m027910; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:09:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:09:13 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-ID: <20040812030913.GD27338@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20040812012909.GA25768@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <2CD52765-EC03-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2CD52765-EC03-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Ken Smith cc: re@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Alfred Perlstein cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Doug Barton cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Ceri Davies Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add Makefile add.h extract.c futil.c main.c perform.c pkg_add.1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/create Makefile create.h main.c perform.c pkg_create.1 pl.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete Makefile delete.h main.c perform.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 03:10:38 -0000 On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 03:58:58AM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Ok, I'll write a patch then. [ I said some of this to Oliver privately but it's probably worth saying louder... ] First thank you, the effort is appreciated. Second some people had asked that this be backed out. It sounds like Oliver is agreeable to adding -c so I'm OK with his previous commit remaining in RELENG_4 as long as adding -c doesn't take too long. Despite some users who probably shouldn't be tracking RELENG_4, it *is* the -stable *development* branch. Paranoid users should at this point be tracking RELENG_4_10 instead. Having -c disappear from RELENG_4 for a brief time is OK as long as it re-appears in a reasonable amount of time (and way before we start talking 4.11-RELEASE). -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |