From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 18 20:09:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E94D16A41C for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:09:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: from neptune.atopia.net (neptune.atopia.net [209.128.231.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C0943D46 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:09:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@atopia.net) Received: by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B27896178; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:09:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neptune.atopia.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A02614E; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:09:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:09:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak To: dick hoogendijk In-Reply-To: <20050718220807.450b629e.dick@nagual.st> Message-ID: <20050718160922.O76819@neptune.atopia.net> References: <42BF8815.6090909@atopia.net> <20050627081933.GA97832@cell.sick.ru> <42C16394.4040904@atopia.net> <1119971279.36316.45.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <42C16C0E.9090002@atopia.net> <20050629100535.GC27557@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050701184352.GA177@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050706093012.M3376@titanic.medinet.si> <20050706104344.U4718@titanic.medinet.si> <20050712141639.U72892@neptune.atopia.net> <20050717131610.T29059@titanic.medinet.si> <20050718143155.T74874@neptune.atopia.net> <20050718220807.450b629e.dick@nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD -STABLE servers repeatedly crashing. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:09:59 -0000 > I find this messages kind of weird. Are you saying your servers only run long periods of uptime with pf and *not* with ipf? I run a server and almost never put it down. IPF performs very well, including a lot of natting for my home network. Correct. IPF is unstable with our SMP (most of the time) - based 5.x boxes. VERY unstable. VERY VERY unstable. -Matt