From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 18:03:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C241065673 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 18:03:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B768FC12 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 18:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id q4HI2cSH059782; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:02:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1337277759; bh=2e6KaCvVPMTzf1mQuJeQWBnPs6r60SxAvjaRiISplDE=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=tAE7DYde5RyLrQZ0N3fMknu5M/n4aJXt4MppMbV1qwl2nxDV30ET25A+RTnoo2Ok4 hmNgAvVfnArjuL/m/gvEtO0xlqmEj/pmv2/S3+8L9B0P76zr5QNer35zfK0cI+UgKQ W+sfk8U5UVTl6FEbDCAbXDDx5ym9HxkOm5XbO3aI= From: Sean Bruno To: "Li, Qing" In-Reply-To: References: <4FB4B682.4020606@zhegan.in> <1337276670.15253.2.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:02:37 -0700 Message-ID: <1337277757.15253.3.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Milter-Version: master.31+4-gbc07cd5+ X-CLX-ID: 277758002 Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Eugene M. Zheganin" Subject: RE: ECMP and RADIX_MPATH X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:03:08 -0000 On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 10:56 -0700, Li, Qing wrote: > It is not working properly in one case, of load balancing among > physical > interfaces having a single prefix, all are attached to the same > physical > link, and reaching a single first-hop router. > > Ah, I see. thank you for the clarification. Sean