From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed May 26 18:35:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C4D15005 for ; Wed, 26 May 1999 18:35:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA04503; Wed, 26 May 1999 18:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199905270135.SAA04503@implode.root.com> To: William Maddox Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for Symbios vs. Adaptect SCSI In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 26 May 1999 18:17:51 PDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 18:35:22 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > >You recently made the following remark on freebsd-hardware: > >> The Adaptec chips are generally better supported in >> FreeBSD and I wouldn't consider anything else for systems that I build. >> >> -DG >> >> David Greenman >> Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org >> Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com > >Could you elaborate on what you mean by "better supported"? > >Do you mean: > > 1) Has fewer bugs? > 2) Makes better use of the hardware capabilities? > 3) Has a maintainer who is willing/able to devote > more time to the task? "Yes". Anything further on this needs to come from Justin Gibbs. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message