From owner-svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 21:25:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE96A10656A5; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:25:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk1.360sip.com [72.236.70.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8308FC19; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.38] (S0106005004e13421.vs.shawcable.net [70.71.167.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAULP1GS090380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:25:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4B14382F.5080000@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:25:03 -0800 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Judge References: <200911151143.nAFBhTSD036619@svn.freebsd.org> <4B141D2E.1000203@FreeBSD.org> <4B142655.6030703@tomjudge.com> In-Reply-To: <4B142655.6030703@tomjudge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stanislav Sedov , svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-stable-7@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn: stable/7/sys: conf dev/bce X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:25:03 -0000 Tom Judge wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> Is the option related to Jumbo Frames in any way? If not, IMHO the name >> should be changed to avoid any confusion. > > The bug is easier to reproduce when jumbo frames are turned on however > we have seen it with normal frames also. Can we change the name then? We've seen the similar issue without the jumbo frames, which made me wonder. Also, perhaps we should make it a default and/or tunable. Having user to recompile kernel just to save 20 bytes of text segment is not very practical these days. -Maxim