Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:08:14 -0500 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: keeping freebsd uptodate - doubt Message-ID: <16896.64238.660704.447338@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <4200F87F.6070205@orchid.homeunix.org> References: <20050202144907.18974.qmail@web51709.mail.yahoo.com> <4200F87F.6070205@orchid.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Karol Kwiatkowski writes: > Someone else should comment on that, but I think updating (cvsup) > ports tree once a week should be often enough to track changes > and rare enough to not overload mirrors. The other theory involves more frequent (i,e, daily) but presumably smaller updates. On the gripping hand ... I'm not convinced the mirrors are in danger of overload except possibly at the end of a ports freeze. Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16896.64238.660704.447338>