From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 2 13:03:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC063B6 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 13:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B861A11AA for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 13:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB2D3nmG053916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:03:49 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rB2D3n0f053915; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:03:49 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:03:49 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Ilya Bakulin Subject: Re: unbound-control in FreeBSD-CURRENT and stable/10 Message-ID: <20131202130349.GJ48919@glebius.int.ru> References: <20131129142143.GA29437@olymp.kibab.com> <20131129142729.GA29580@olymp.kibab.com> <20131130082939.GJ90895@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:03:53 -0000 On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 01:58:26PM +0100, Ilya Bakulin wrote: I> > Shouldn't /usr/local/bin be earlier in your $PATH than /usr/bin? I> I> The system is shipped with .dot files that have /usr/local/bin _after_ I> /usr/bin. I agree that that is not optimal. I> Maybe it's not too late to change this? My vote is "yes", but we need a much wider discussion for such a change. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.