From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 14 15:16:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F2216A4CE for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:16:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3A143D3F for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:16:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp137-206.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.206])i7EFGmHY058599; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 00:46:48 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Chuck Swiger Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 00:46:48 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200408141740.58105.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> <411E1CBF.3090404@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <411E1CBF.3090404@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200408150046.48122.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: freebsd-questions Questions Subject: Re: Fetchmail/Sendmail rejects X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:16:51 -0000 On Saturday 14 August 2004 23:37, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Malcolm Kay wrote: > [ ... ] > > > I am quite happy to have these rejected but it seems they don't > > get deleted at the ISP end and clog up the mail box, I think > > eventually confusing fetchmail. > > You ought to convince your ISP to apply better spam filtering before they > accept messages for you, which will reduce the problem you see. > I agree except that my ISP already provides extensive SPAM filtering. The problem is with those that don't trip the ISP's spam filter. I am able to set the spam trigger level -- maybe I should be setting this lower. But I don't believe unsolvable addresses is included in his criteria. > > Responding to 2 or 3 lists using a valid e-mail address means that > > I receive a lot of spam including much with unresolvable addresses. > > Nowadays, you can receive a lot of spam regardless of what you do, so it > helps to reject most of it immediately. Agreed Malcolm