From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 15 04:01:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05B216A402 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 04:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc6-cmbg1-0-0-cust82.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.10.236.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FD343D46 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 04:01:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.61 #1) id 1FUbyZ-0001Cb-0w by authid for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 05:01:35 +0100 Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 05:01:34 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060415040134.GE47768@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060415030207.GD47768@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9crTWz/Z+Zyzu20v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 04:01:36 -0000 --9crTWz/Z+Zyzu20v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:22:26PM -0400, fbsd wrote: > you are wrong in giving this guy incorrect info. > ipfw can be run just by adding correct statement to rc.conf > it does not have to be compiled into kernel > maybe you should read the firewall section first before giving > advice Ack. You are quite right. To the OP - you do not need to include the options in your kernel. However, doing so will not damage your health. It is personal preference on my part, and I foolishly allowed that to taint the information I offered. However, I now feel suitably castigated for my ebullience... Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --9crTWz/Z+Zyzu20v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEQHAeixf5fBYiFmoRAiVxAKDce0039ghNeARUtn8OPe2261jtVQCghll/ NhSV2ly7k97EoLTX5hHAUmY= =bNfT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9crTWz/Z+Zyzu20v--