From owner-freebsd-current Tue Sep 18 16:59:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from kayak.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E94437B413; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by kayak.xcllnt.net (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f8INx6Q02746; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:59:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:58:24 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: chris@calldei.com, phk@critter.freebsd.dk, brent@rcfile.org, current@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Junior Kernel Hacker task: improve vnode->v_tag Message-ID: <20010918165824.A2715@kayak.xcllnt.net> References: <20010908030110.E548@holly.calldei.com> <200109081154.OAA95138@www.abc.com.ua> <20010908150620.F548@holly.calldei.com> <3BA7397D.A82C213@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BA7397D.A82C213@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 03:09:33PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: The patch looks ok. There's a slight functional change that an ext2fs filesystem is now correctly returned as such. I don't expect Linux binaries to break, but it may be remotely possible that certain tools, now that they detect ext2fs filesystems, will use more specific ext2fs queries for whatever reason they need. I don't think it's something to worry about... > - case VT_UFS: > + else if (strcmp(fstypename, "ufs") == 0) > return (LINUX_UFS_SUPER_MAGIC); > - } > + else if (strcmp(fstypename, "ext2fs") == 0) > + return (LINUX_EXT2_SUPER_MAGIC); -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message