From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 16 19:22: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 844231531C for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:21:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca [204.244.186.218] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4) id 10N6tj-0003eE-00; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:21:35 -0800 Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:21:32 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Rich Wood Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Rich Wood wrote: > As people have pointed out, it takes a while to distribute CD's, as it > stands, if 3.2 was to be released on May 1st, it would give 3.1-RELEASE a > useable life of about 6 weeks[1] before 3.2-RELEASE was `created`. ... > [1] For those of us outside USA. My CD only arrived on 13/3/99 That doesn't quite make sense. If the 3.1 CD took a long time to get out to you, why would the 3.1 CD be delivered instantaneously? > Rich > > -- > rich@dynamite.org > If that's what they call normal, I'd rather be insane. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message