From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 00:37:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B845106566B for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:37:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8788FC0A for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so2350247rvb.3 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:37:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nZU4kl8fC0XnPKoxOcG/ZOV1gU6eSajpNugvkr8Is88=; b=TygQmN0lBfSv+823rRll3idERMCqBCXGPs8HkzbEUDvTaCnHCYsHT0BttqQWEPx1Oz jTELXDQYyJl2uW8ZxanzxPKCJO5jMOlCXsV5IsE6VIEJN7D8Mss40AKUOzuuK4dChIQQ V7Xt1/4/uKlJc7ZvwjBlLdB76Q7poMZY6APVw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Z60SLU0dldFAN2S5npSbPzHfEE7/sdhLFf9EF0Og4ANpSlRYaARTAVkDwndXvprUCr Rne9FO/8Sk4lu0ryVqrXqUPiFpidn1ERZ6SaQC139a31XWKipHGw41CBIeh4iTnTIfNc fO2Sg+LjN9YnY3ysjvKfMVbIOIbpcKhHeVB8M= Received: by 10.114.159.5 with SMTP id h5mr4800586wae.36.1238546247553; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aargh.lan (ool-182fcc8b.dyn.optonline.net [24.47.204.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m6sm631228wag.49.2009.03.31.17.37.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:37:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49D2B762.8010207@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:37:54 -0400 From: Eitan Adler User-Agent: Mozilla (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; ) Gecko Thunderbird Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tingox@gmail.com References: <91b92520903311028k52be00edr49f830e555e3a8dc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=E9C2CCD1; url=pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ansi colors in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:37:28 -0000 > Perhaps because it is unneccessary? > IMHO, I prefer the ports infrastructure to be functional, rather than > "nice looking" any day. It could be both ;) Functional is often a result of a nice looking display as well. > -- Eitan Adler "Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave." -Jakob Nielsen