From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Jul 14 1:25:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.sunesi.net (ns1.sunesi.net [196.15.192.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52C837B586; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 01:25:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nbm@sunesi.net) Received: from nbm by ns1.sunesi.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1) id 13D0mg-000G8Y-00; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:25:22 +0200 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:25:22 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: Ben Smithurst Cc: Nik Clayton , freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAQ addition Message-ID: <20000714102522.A61949@mithrandr.moria.org> References: <396A79E9.F3AD3D1@home.com> <20000713011414.B11472@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> <20000713213435.M48641@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000713213435.M48641@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>; from ben@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 09:34:35PM +0100 Organization: Sunesi Clinical Systems X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386 X-URL: http://rucus.ru.ac.za/~nbm/ Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu 2000-07-13 (21:34), Ben Smithurst wrote: > I'm intending to add something like this, > > --- book.sgml 2000/07/11 21:36:22 1.70 > +++ book.sgml 2000/07/13 20:32:50 > @@ -8411,6 +8411,20 @@ > > > > +Why does top show very little free memory when I > +have very few programs running? > + > +The simple answer is that free memory is wasted memory. > +Any memory that your programs don't actively allocate is used > +within the FreeBSD kernel as disk cache. The values shown by > +top labelled as Inact, > +Cache, and Buf are all > +cached data at different aging levels. You actually want as little > +Free memory as possible. > + > + > + > + > Why use (what are) a.out and ELF executable formats? > > > My only worry is that it's not detailed enough. Perhaps I could search > the -questions archive to find other answers from the past and combine > bits from them all... I'll look at that shortly. Oooh, another person foolish enough to attempt to rein in the FAQ. ;) Actually, that looks good. I'd prefer instead of . Also instead of . My (limited) understanding is when you're talking about a program or group of programs, it's , and if you're talking about a somewhat specific command (like "rm -rf /"), it's . You could just skip that, and use &man.top.1; *grin*. Nik, can you give me a refresher? (: Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Sunesi Clinical Systems nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message