From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 20:40:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DD816A4C4 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9506F13C448 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0KKe4kD080881 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m0KKe40l080880; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:40:04 GMT Message-Id: <200801202040.m0KKe40l080880@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: Marius Strobl Cc: Subject: Re: kern/112654: [pcn] Kernel panic upon if_pcn module load on a Netfinity 5000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marius Strobl List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:40:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/112654; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Marius Strobl To: Nagy Keve , wforms@Safe-mail.net, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/112654: [pcn] Kernel panic upon if_pcn module load on a Netfinity 5000 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:37:55 +0100 On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:10:02AM +0000, Nagy Keve wrote: > > An important update is that my earlier conclusion regarding the patch was f= > lawed. > The patch DOES WORK on RELENG_6, it gets rid of the kernel panic upon loadi= > ng the module and it DOES FIND the appropriate cable media connected. I a= > m still unable to explain what caused the "no carrier" issue during my ea= > rlier attempts with this patch. That probably was because of nsphy(4) not being the correct driver in order to determine the link status of this PHY. > So the concept is proved, this could be a proper fix if we can get the pcn = > driver to use ns_phy instead of uk_phy. With the current patch both ns_ph= > y and uk_phy shows up in dmesg, and I would rather see ns_phy only. > Could you please give a kernel built with the patch at: http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/nsphyter.diff or for RELENG_6: http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/nsphyter.diff_RELENG_6 instead of the patch for nsphy(4) a try? Marius