From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 3 08:50:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA04484 for current-outgoing; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 08:50:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA04459 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 08:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA14548; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 09:46:43 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 09:46:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199610031546.JAA14548@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (Andrey A. Chernov) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans), current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-current) Subject: Re: 'howmany' cruft In-Reply-To: <199610031523.TAA00926@nagual.ru> References: <199610031523.TAA00926@nagual.ru> Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk KOI8-R writes: > What I find in > sys/types.h: > #ifndef howmany > #define howmany(x, y) (((x) + ((y) - 1)) / (y)) > #endif > I find it because netpbm redifines it and gcc produce warning on this place. > It looks very suspicious for me (I mean ANSI namespace violation). > Do we really need it? Can we rename it to _howmany at least? Please! Nate