From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 14:41:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A38B16A4CE for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:41:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mandarin.fruitsalad.org (pc117.net160.koping.net [81.16.160.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F30743D1D for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:41:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lauri@kde.org) Received: from [192.168.15.5] (helo=localhost.invalid) by mandarin.fruitsalad.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1ArPWG-0005gV-Ao; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:41:16 +0100 From: Lauri Watts To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:40:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <402BD360.6030808@bredband.net> <20040212210545.GA37966@users.munk.nu> <200402122238.33896.lauri@kde.org> In-Reply-To: <200402122238.33896.lauri@kde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_tDALAEPx6LtKVtA"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402122340.45981.lauri@kde.org> cc: gaf cc: Jez Hancock Subject: Re: /tmp full (newbie) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:41:17 -0000 --Boundary-02=_tDALAEPx6LtKVtA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 12 February 2004 22.38, Lauri Watts wrote: > With some judicious cleaning up of the cruft in /usr/ports/* (try > portsclean, part of the portupgrade suited), possibly nuking /usr/obj > (although you'll want space back for that if you build world again) and > some investigation into maybe rolling over logs more often, and emptying > out /tmp, there's no pressing reason the OP should need to repartiiton a= nd > reinstall, especially not for the sake of either KDE or GNOME. To clarify this, since I'm editing my silly typo below, personally, I think= I=20 would reinstall in the current situation. I just meant it's probably not=20 urgently in need of doing right this minute just to get KDE running. There= 's=20 probably a fair amount of cleanup, and the other posters symlinking=20 suggestions, that will provide the immediate solution of 'get back up and=20 running' for the present. A reorganisation in the future, is not a bad ide= a=20 though. > I think for most people the installers auto defaults are not pretty s/not/now/ I meant here, honest. Regards, =2D-=20 Lauri Watts KDE Documentation: http://i18n.kde.org/doc/ KDE on FreeBSD: http://freebsd.kde.org/ --Boundary-02=_tDALAEPx6LtKVtA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBALADt/gUyA7PWnacRAnKcAJ0Z4f7PbZigkvZLQpUOKvnKET3ljwCdFMKk 1oHpEhgDkhJRubUWOV0kLH0= =Ynjl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_tDALAEPx6LtKVtA--