From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 16:52:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3666416A4CE for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:52:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from lx05-hrz.uni-duisburg.de (lx05-hrz.uni-duisburg.de [134.91.4.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6F243FA3 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:52:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark.weinem@uni-duisburg.de) Received: from pandora.plagegeister.de (athome14.uni-duisburg.de [134.91.17.24])hAS0qKod029845 for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 01:52:20 +0100 Received: (nullmailer pid 7946 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 23:41:29 -0000 Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:41:29 +0100 From: Mark Weinem To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031127234129.GA4502@pandora.plagegeister.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200311201127.59090.pvandenbergen@swin.edu.au> <200311201113.29006.pvandenbergen@swin.edu.au> <20031120002418.GA16870@lewiz.org> <200311201127.59090.pvandenbergen@swin.edu.au> <5.2.0.9.2.20031127003929.01e02930@pop.voyager.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20031127003929.01e02930@pop.voyager.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: SWEEP virus detection utility, Copyright (c) 1989,2003 Sophos X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Subject: Re: upgrading 4.8 to 4.9 question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:52:27 -0000 On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Dragoncrest wrote: > Mergemaster is definately one way to do it, but I prefer > Portupgrade. It's much simpler as far as I'm concerned and > does as good a job as mergemaster with less thinking involved > on the part of the user. :) Confusion! Mergemaster and portupgrade are very different tools. > Just CVsup your ports, then do "portupgrade -r -all", then > walk away and let it run. If you want to do a single port, > just do "portupgrade -r portname" Regular use of the ports system requires some maintenance - it's not just CVSup & portupgrade, for example: 1. CVSup 2. portsdb -Uu 3. pkgdb -F 4. portinstall or portupgrade 5. pkgdb -F Ciao, Mark Weinem