From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 18 18:45:44 2013
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458996BC;
 Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:45:44 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from makc@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.issp.ac.ru (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3400133D;
 Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:45:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mercury.ph.man.ac.uk [130.88.75.175:14564] (HELO/EHLO
 mercury.ph.man.ac.uk, authenticated with LOGIN)
 by mail.issp.ac.ru with ESMTP/inet id r3IIjZE2057836 (using TLSv1/SSLv3,
 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits), verified NO)
 Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:45:35 +0400 (MSK)
From: Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org>
To: Jason Helfman <jgh@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r315930 - in head/security: . qtkeychain
 qtkeychain/files
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:47:10 +0000
Message-ID: <1853095.FfMfqcVszJ@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk>
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (FreeBSD/9.1-STABLE; KDE/4.10.2; amd64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAMuy=+iKdPFQrPV4Nexm9nO2zJ3Q19DG9dUcdvem36Sm0NAmDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201304170606.r3H66PaE072875@svn.freebsd.org>
 <1398299.9HVlrbp22m@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk>
 <CAMuy=+iKdPFQrPV4Nexm9nO2zJ3Q19DG9dUcdvem36Sm0NAmDQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>,
 "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, 6yearold@gmail.com,
 "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:45:44 -0000

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:35:55 -0700 Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 06:06:25 +0000Wed Apr 17 06:06:24 2013 Jason Helfman
> > wrote:
> > > Author: jgh
> > > Date: Wed Apr 17 06:06:24 2013
> > > New Revision: 315930
> > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/315930
> > >
> > > Log:
> > >   - add new port: security/qtkeychain
> > >
> > >   QtKeychain is a Qt API to store passwords and other secret data
> > securely.How
> > >   the data is stored depends on the platform.
> > >   For Linux/Unix, KWallet (via D-Bus) is used. Support for the GNOME
> > Keyring
> > >   via freedesktop.org's Secret Storage D-Bus specification is planned
> > >   but not yet implemented.
> > >
> > >   WWW: https://github.com/frankosterfeld/qtkeychain
> > >
> > >   PR:         177634
> > >   Submitted by:       6yearold@gmail.com
> >
> > > Added: head/security/qtkeychain/pkg-plist
> > >
> > ==============================================================================
> > > --- /dev/null 00:00:00 1970   (empty, because file is newly added)
> > > +++ head/security/qtkeychain/pkg-plist        Wed Apr 17 06:06:24 2013
> >      (r315930)
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > > +include/qtkeychain/keychain.h
> > > +include/qtkeychain/qkeychain_export.h
> > > +lib/cmake/QtKeychain/QtKeychainConfig.cmake
> > > +lib/cmake/QtKeychain/QtKeychainConfigVersion.cmake
> > > +lib/cmake/QtKeychain/QtKeychainLibraryDepends-release.cmake
> >
> > It should be
> > 'lib/cmake/QtKeychain/QtKeychainLibraryDepends-%%CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE%%.cmake'
> >
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/building.html#using-cmake
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Max
> >
> >
> Thanks, Max!
> 
> Good to know. Do you think this requires a PORTREVISION?

no, this change doesn't need PORTREVISION bump: default package is not
affected.

Max