From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:26:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13C91065673 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594DB8FC1D for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfk1 with SMTP id fk1so16174551vcb.13 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:26:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oH+gbOsnTBKZHGLkJNLgb3A/CvxbURg4n6Pq49hgTXE=; b=CzLh6NgpcjUR+eKw7mK9iYdWL9LPosuP7/gQJObldfn0kYVDRr0q5INdDHgCKQ+bBi qtFQRBUYUAqnzyqaeM/cftgvAuFjCKvyTaSdFgmTsY02Bz7F7ZtN06/wD854Y6q03gVO 5d2WKzfk3arYSXcA8xOu/Pt5e1Kou/k/zo94o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.149.193 with SMTP id u1mr16833374vcv.33.1325010367308; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:26:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.36.5 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:26:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EFA0D51.4080707@bettercom.de> References: <4EF50AF4.3030105@bettercom.de> <4EFA0539.2020508@bettercom.de> <4EFA0D51.4080707@bettercom.de> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:26:07 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RlV-apCb45WtezQ1R-qWKgq6m1o Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Martin Lesser Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ath updates - please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:26:08 -0000 On 27 December 2011 10:24, Martin Lesser wrote: > Am 27.12.2011 19:05, schrieb Adrian Chadd: > Are there plans to backport "developing" base/head/sys/dev/ath/* to the > upcoming 9.X-release? ;-) Nope. It's way way too different to what's in 9.x to even begin thinking about an MFC. I don't want to make 9.x any more of a pain in the ass to debug. :) Adrian