Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:25:27 -0600 From: "Mark Felder" <feld@feld.me> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rtld optimizations Message-ID: <op.vpw84o0b34t2sn@tech304> In-Reply-To: <20110125234911.223d8f75@kan.dnsalias.net> References: <AANLkTikwHteyqMfMpy_B-AxQ5ZQ_Z3RKhkNpGN23fXtX@mail.gmail.com> <20110125234911.223d8f75@kan.dnsalias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:49:11 -0600, Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> wrote: > The only extra quirk that said commit > does is an optimization of a dlsym() call, which is hardly ever in > critical performance path. It's really not my place to say, but it seems strange that if an optimization is available people would ignore it because they don't think it's important enough. I don't understand this mentality; if it's not going to break anything and it obviously can improve performance in certain use cases, why not merge it and make FreeBSD even better? Regards, Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.vpw84o0b34t2sn>