From owner-cvs-ports  Wed Jul  5 14:24:22 1995
Return-Path: cvs-ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA06642
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 14:24:22 -0700
Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA06634
          ; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 14:24:16 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA15691; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 14:24:15 -0700
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 1995 14:24:15 -0700
Message-Id: <199507052124.OAA15691@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jmz@freefall.cdrom.com
CC: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@freefall.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <199507051358.GAA23870@freefall.cdrom.com> (message from Jean-Marc Zucconi on Wed, 5 Jul 1995 06:58:54 -0700)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/pTk - Imported sources
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: cvs-ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Jean-Marc,

 *   This is a rename of the nTk port (now called pTk), upgraded to beta-5

I wish you asked about it first.  If this is really an upgrade/rename
of nTk, we could have done this as a repository copy.  That way we
could have kept all the cvs information.  (And they are very useful
when I'm trying to track how the port evolved.)

I don't know if it's still possible to do it that way now that the new 
one is committed...Rod, what do you think?

Satoshi