From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 17 02:36:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19B016A400 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from aibo1.runbox.com (aibo1.runbox.com [193.71.199.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70CE13C441 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [10.9.9.161] (helo=patch.runbox.com ident=Debian-exim) by greyhound.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HIFRD-0002dT-1w; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:36:35 +0100 Received: from [76.184.133.124] (helo=[192.168.214.215]) by patch.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:650175 ) (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1HIFRC-0000uZ-FU; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:36:34 +0100 Message-ID: <45D66A30.6080401@computer.org> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:36:32 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070127) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <1d3ed48c0702161615m6b2dec1aha6c95c1f22c88aa1@mail.gmail.com> <20070216201145.54e43601.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20070216201145.54e43601.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kevin Downey , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Internet Explorer on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:36:55 -0000 On 02/16/2007 19:11, Bill Moran wrote: > "Kevin Downey" wrote: >> I do a bit of web dev stuff so it would be nice to be able to see the >> page in IE. >> A website I use for work uses ActiveX. >> I hate dual booting. >> What is the best(easiest) way to run ie on freebsd? > > In addition to everything else that's been suggested, give qemu > a try. It's rather slow, but I use it often for an app we need > that only runs on widows. > I'll second the qemu. And the speed (or lack thereof) is bearable if you get kqemu going as well. -- Regards, Eric