From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 16:19:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D1216A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:19:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6FB43D55 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:19:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD71651EB; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:19:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 40780-03-3; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:19:38 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (adsl-64-171-184-46.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.171.184.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7277A651FC; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:19:37 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 13FC361C6; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:19:35 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Sam Message-ID: <20040916161935.GJ1047@empiric.icir.org> Mail-Followup-To: Sam , Jan Grant , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <41483C97.2030303@fer.hr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:19:41 -0000 On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:00:44AM -0500, Sam wrote: > >Yes, it's a single filesystem. But the storage most likely won't be all > >in one place. Making it look like it's accessible from one place is a > >good thing. > > ... are you hinting at multiple globally remote block accessible storage > sets? Otherwise I'm at a loss. To the best of my knowledge, no, ZFS/DFS is only accessible locally on the machine it's mounted on. But the block storage can be scattered across multiple devices. It can be exported via NFS, this much I know. BMS