From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jun 1 8:10:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mel.alcatel.fr (mel.alcatel.fr [212.208.74.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E1D15085 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 08:10:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr) Received: from aifhs2.alcatel.fr (mailhub.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.80]) by mel.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id QAA23125; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 16:07:54 +0200 Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id RAA13135; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 17:05:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from telss1 (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA28567; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 16:57:10 +0200 (MEST) Received: from telspace.alcatel.fr by telss1 (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id RAA02870; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 17:01:17 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3753F714.E66C7E82@telspace.alcatel.fr> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 17:07:00 +0200 From: Thierry Herbelot Reply-To: thierry.herbelot@alcatel.fr Organization: Alcatel CIT Nanterre X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4m) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" , stable Subject: Re: NFS in FreeBSD-3-STABLE? References: <000f01beac3a$7628d260$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------AAA42A4962E55B87E2FA3BD0" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------AAA42A4962E55B87E2FA3BD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit CC'd to -Stable Yes UDP should be slower / but NFS over TCP was advertised as buggy by a core member. The summary of the NFS thread was that only SUN has a really working NFS v3 over TCP (plus its licensees). TfH PS : I have set these options in /etc/fstab bg ,intr ,nfsv3, mntudp "Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote: > > Actually, I am not sure. I do a command mount: > > mount -t nfs 192.168.0.1:/usr/src /usr/src > mount -t nfs 192.168.0.1:/usr/obj /usr/obj > > The order does not matter, but only the first attempt succeeds, until I > reboot the target machine (3.2-STABLE). > > I will look into the options for mount_nfs and set UDP as my option. I must > assume that TCP is the default. Isn't UDP a bit slower for this sort of > application? > > Tom Veldhouse > veldy@visi.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thierry Herbelot > To: Thomas Veldhouse > Cc: Harlan Stenn ; stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > Date: Tuesday, June 01, 1999 9:07 AM > Subject: Re: NFS in FreeBSD-3-STABLE? > > >Hello, > > > >Do you use NFS over TCP ? if yes, you should go back to NFS over UDP > >(via a mntudp option in /etc/fstab - man mount_nfs to see the exact > >wording of the options), as NFS v3 with TCP is still buggy in 3.x > > > >I'm using NFS v3 over UDP in my home network and so far, so good (this a > >very light-load network, though) > > > > TfH > > > > > >Thomas Veldhouse wrote: > >> > >> I don't know, but I am running 3.2-STABLE as of Friday and > >> 3.1-19990430-SNAP on a different box. When I try to mount the 3.2 box > via > >> NFS (/usr/src and /usr/obj) I get a "RPC timeout" message on the 3.1 box. > >> If I umount /usr/src and try to mount them again, I can't mount anything. > >> If I reboot the 3.2 box, I am back to being able to mount one directory > >> again. NFS is configured as it always has been, so I don't think that is > >> the problem. The problem appears to be in the 3.2 box. All other > network > >> traffic is fine (de0 on 3.2 and ed0 on 3.1). The 3.1 box is a > >> gateway/firewall for the rest of my network. > >> > >> /usr -alldirs -maproot=0 192.168.0.3 > >> > >> I am logged in as root when I try to use NFS. > >> > >> Tom Veldhouse > >> veldy@visi.com > >> > >> On Mon, 31 May 1999, Harlan Stenn wrote: > >> > >> > I've done some digging, but obviously not enough to find the answers to > the > >> > following questions. > >> > > >> > - Did the NFS patches make it in to 3.2-STABLE? > >> > > >> > - How reliable is NFS in 3.2-STABLE these days? > >> > > >> > Thanks... > >> > > >> > H > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > >> > > >> > >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message --------------AAA42A4962E55B87E2FA3BD0 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="thierry.herbelot.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Thierry Herbelot Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="thierry.herbelot.vcf" begin:vcard n:Herbelot;Thierry tel;work:(+33) 1 46 52 47 23 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://perso.cybercable.fr/herbelot org:CIT Nanterre adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:thierry.herbelot@alcatel.fr x-mozilla-cpt:;-22032 fn:Thierry Herbelot end:vcard --------------AAA42A4962E55B87E2FA3BD0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message