From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Mar 11 21:55:53 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA01832
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:55:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA01825
          Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.4/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA00645; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:54:23 -0800 (PST)
To: Garth Kidd <garth@pisces.systems.sa.gov.au>
cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami), torstenb@freebsd.org,
        ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ssh port update 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 12 Mar 1996 10:17:50 +0930."
             <960312141835.ZM2871@jolt.systems.sa.gov.au> 
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 21:54:23 -0800
Message-ID: <643.826610063@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I'll try the official port.  One question; should I use pkg_manage to 
> delete my original attempt first?  Will it get confused if I just go ahead 
> and make install again?

I would just make install again.  Also, don't get too comfortable with
pkg_manage - it's gone away in -current and will eventually (soon I
hope) be replaced with something better.

> [Related: I'm about to upgrade from fvwm 1.x to fvwm 2.x; should I delete 
> the old one first with pkg_manage?]

I most definitely would not do that - I played with fvwm2 a bit (which
co-exists perfectly happy with the first version of fvwm - the port
maintainer being quite careful about this, I was very happy to see)
and I didn't like it at all.  I quickly ran back to the original.

					Jordan