Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:25:27 +0000 (GMT) From: Kiril Mitev <kiril@ideaglobal.com> To: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV Cc: kiril@ideaglobal.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PGP ver.5 - is this the way its supposed to be ? Message-ID: <199907131825.SAA35648@loki.ideaglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <199907131747.KAA16844@stennis.ca.sandia.gov> from "Bruce A. Mah" at "Jul 13, 1999 10:47:46 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If memory serves me right, Kiril Mitev wrote: > > Just installed security/pgp5, which gives us /usr/local/bin/pgp5, but > > running it gives the error: > > > > Invoked with unknown symlink > > > > My gut feeling is that is REALLY should be called bin/pgp, anyone care > > to comment on that ? > > PGP 5 is a little different than PGP 2 in that it's designed to be > invoked as a bunch of different commands, rather than one command with > a flag to choose its behavior. So: > > pgpk Key management > pgpe Encrypt (maybe sign too) > pgps Sign > pgpv Verify Mmm Hmm Who gets to fix elm/kdemail/etc, then :-) ? > > In reality, the last three are links to a single binary named pgp5. All > four commands have manpages, and they'll all print help information if > invoked without any flags or filenames. > > Hope this helps, > > Bruce. > > [application/pgp-signature is not supported, skipping...] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907131825.SAA35648>