From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 18 3:33:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cartman.techsupport.co.uk (cabletel1.cableol.net [194.168.3.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E40D37B422 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 03:33:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ceri@techsupport.co.uk) Received: from ceri by cartman.techsupport.co.uk with local (Exim 3.22 #2) id 150haS-0002zr-00; Fri, 18 May 2001 11:34:24 +0100 Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:34:24 +0100 From: Ceri To: Kenneth Wayne Culver Cc: "Jon O." , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD benchmark question Message-ID: <20010518113424.A10217@cartman.techsupport.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from culverk@wam.umd.edu on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 05:19:13PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 05:19:13PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver said: > > Is there a way to get the FreeBSD box to hog the processor > > right off the bat? > > > you could make a script that calls the program, finds its pid, then > renices it to a better priority. Wouldn't it be easier to just start it up with the priority required? See nice(1). Ceri -- We've tried this God stuff long enough. It's time for a change. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message