From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Mar 23 11:01:25 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA19561
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 11:01:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de (helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de [141.31.166.22])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA19555
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 11:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from helbig@localhost)
	by helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA00327;
	Sun, 23 Mar 1997 20:00:57 +0100 (MET)
From: Wolfgang Helbig <helbig@MX.BA-Stuttgart.De>
Message-Id: <199703231900.UAA00327@helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: CTM?
In-Reply-To: <E0w8rO5-0002Ey-00@rover.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Mar 23, 97 10:48:57 am"
To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh)
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 20:00:57 +0100 (MET)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

> Hmmmm, is CTM being a little slow, or do I have problems on my end
> with disk space?  I've not seen a CTM for a whole day, and now I get
> 3154 which is 3 later (rather than 1 later) than my last CTM delta.

CTM #3153 arrived at 22 Mar 15:00 GMT. And then CTM #3154 1/13 today
at 17:00 GMT. So there was a short dry period but no delta is missing.

In fact, Rich's ctm-service proved to work as flawless as smatter's.

Wolfgang