From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Sep  5 23:56:42 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA01340
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Sep 1996 23:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ra.dkuug.dk (ra.dkuug.dk [193.88.44.193])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA01312;
          Thu, 5 Sep 1996 23:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sos@localhost) by ra.dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id IAA28432; Fri, 6 Sep 1996 08:56:22 +0200
Message-Id: <199609060656.IAA28432@ra.dkuug.dk>
Subject: Re: interest in syscons cut&paste patches for 2.1.5?
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 08:56:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: sos@freebsd.org, marcs@alive.ampr.ab.ca, FreeBSD-stable@freebsd.org,
        FreeBSD-hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <15753.841992664@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Sep 5, 96 11:51:04 pm
From: sos@freebsd.org
Reply-to: sos@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who wrote:
> 
> > I have looked at it, at it looks like a good job, they have my blessing.
> > Maybe they should go into 2.1.6 if that ever happens...
> 
> If you're that confident, all you have to do is roll them into -stable,
> Soren. :-)

OK, but given my last scary results when comitting to current, I'd
rather have someone USED to the -stable branch do it...
Erhm, and maybe we should test it for a couble of days/weeks
first :), I have no 2.1.x boxes here so...

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Soren Schmidt             (sos@FreeBSD.org)             FreeBSD Core Team
               So much code to hack -- so little time.