From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 9 10:58:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA23952 for current-outgoing; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 10:58:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA23921 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 10:58:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA00964; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 19:55:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Geoff Mohler cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Namei cache? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Dec 1997 11:27:53 CST." Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1997 19:55:35 +0100 Message-ID: <962.881693735@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Geoff Mohle r writes: >Did there used to be a directive for configuring the kernel to hav a >large(r) namei cache? > >I thought I saw this around 2.1.5 (or so) in the LINT file, and it really >beefed up the speed of my INN server. > >Ive got my CCD running great at 64k interleave, with -i2048 -c16 as flags >to newfs. > >Im just wondering where that one directive went off to. In current there is little you can do. You can try to increase: kern.maxvnodes debug.wantfreevnodes -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."