From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 10 21:03:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4116E16A41F for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:03:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk (heisenberg.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C2243D45 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:03:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from [82.71.1.109] (helo=[10.0.1.135]) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1ElBsF-0000NJ-PP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:03:19 +0000 Message-ID: <439B4270.7040404@thingy.apana.org.au> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:02:40 +0000 From: David Gerard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051210172500.58401.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <439B17CA.30309@thingy.apana.org.au> <20051210201601.GB79654@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051210201601.GB79654@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.71.1.109] Subject: Re: Freebsd Theme Song X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:03:23 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > The thing you have to remember about Denial is that the ONLY THING he > cares about in an OS is how fast it can route network packets. The > major improvements in other areas of FreeBSD are of absolutely no > interest to him, therefore the whole thing is a waste of time. Huh. But I found 5.x vastly annoying in all sorts of little ways when 4.x seemed to Just Work. I realise this is entirely subjective, but it was noticeable. > But anyway, FreeBSD 6.0 is hugely superior to 5.4 and 4.11 in > filesystem performance. I have been measuring this carefully for the > past couple of months and hope to have the paper out soon. And wifi? Considering mine's the household server and I want to make it all wifi to get rid of the damn cat5 everywhere, I really should get to it ;-) - d.